B. Ellis et al., JOINT ANGLE MEASUREMENT - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE RELIABILITY OF GONIOMETRY AND WIRE TRACING FOR THE HAND, Clinical rehabilitation, 11(4), 1997, pp. 314-320
Objectives: To compare the inter-and intra-rater reliability of goniom
etry and wire tracing in the assessment of finger joint angles: metaca
rpo-phalangeal (MCPJ), proximal (PIPJ) and distal interphalangeal join
ts (DIPJ). Design: Twenty occupational therapists and 20 physiotherapi
sts with a range of clinical experience were recruited from nine diffe
rent centres. Using a masked goniometer and wire tracing they carried
out repealed assessments of the MCPJ, PIPJ and DIPJ of a normal subjec
t fixed in two different positions. Results: The two assessment method
s did not produce comparable angle measurements. Goniometry showed gre
ater inter-and intra-rater reliability than wire tracing. Regardless o
f the assessment tool, the repeatability coefficient indicated that DI
PJ measurement was less reliable than the other joints. Clinical and s
pecialist experience did not affect reliability, Conclusion: Although
both goniometry and wire tracing show limitations as reliable assessme
nt tools, it is recommended that where possible goniometry should be u
sed.