Hl. Wilensky, SOCIAL-SCIENCE AND THE PUBLIC AGENDA - REFLECTIONS ON THE RELATION OFKNOWLEDGE TO POLICY IN THE UNITED-STATES AND ABROAD, Journal of health politics, policy and law, 22(5), 1997, pp. 1241-1265
It is tempting to oversell the practical value of applied research. A
hard look at the effects of U.S. social science on public policy in ar
eas such as active labor market policies (training, job creation, plac
ement, etc.), crime prevention, fiscal policy, poverty reduction, and
health care reform suggests an inverse relationship between social sci
ence consensus and policy and budgetary decisions. Fragmented and dece
ntralized political economies (e.g., the United States) foster policy
segmentation and isolated, short-run single-issue research-often polit
icized and misleading. More corporatist democracies (such as Sweden, N
orway, Austria, and Germany) evidence a tighter relation between knowl
edge and power in which a wider range of issues is connected, longer-r
ange effects are sometimes considered, and research is more often actu
ally used for planning and implementation. Even in less hospitable soc
ieties, however, social science does make its way in the long run. Fav
orable conditions and examples are discussed.