Bw. Cunningham et al., THE EFFECT OF SPINAL DESTABILIZATION AND INSTRUMENTATION ON LUMBAR INTRADISCAL PRESSURE AN IN-VITRO BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 22(22), 1997, pp. 2655-2663
Study Design. In vitro biomechanical testing was performed in human ca
daveric lumbar spines, using pressure needle transducers toanalyie the
effects of spinal destabilization and instrumentation on lumbar intra
discal pressures. Objectives, To quantify changes in lumbar intradisca
l pressures at three adjacent disc levels under conditions of spinal r
econstruction, and to evaluate the possibility Of pressure;induced dis
c pathology secondary to spinal instrumentation. Summary of Background
Data. Lumbar intradiscal pressures under in vivo and in vitro conditi
ons and the use and development of Spinal instrumentation have been in
vestigated comprehensively. However, the effects of spinal destabiliza
tion and instrumentation on lumbar intradiscal pressure have not been
delineated clearly. Methods. In 11 human cadaveric lumbosacral specime
ns, specially designed pressure needle transducers quantified intradis
cal pressure changes at three adjacent disc levels (L2-L3, proximal; L
3-L4, operative; and L4-L5, distal) under four Conditions of spinal st
ability: intact, :destabilized, laminar hook and pedicle screw reconst
ructions. Biomechanical testing was performed under axial compression
(0-600 N), anterior flexion (+12.5 degrees) and extension (-12.5 degre
es), after which the level of degeneration and disc area (cm(2)) were
quantified, Results. In response to destabilization and instrumentatio
n, proximal disc pressures increased as much as 45%, and operative pre
ssure levels decreased 41-55% (P < 0.05), depending on the instrumenta
tion technique. Linear regression and correlation analyses comparing i
ntradiscal pressure to the grade of disc degeneration were not signifi
cant:(r = 0.24): Conclusions. Changes in: segmental intradiscal pressu
re levels occur in response to spinal destabilization and instrumentat
ion (P < 0.05). Intradiscal cyclic pressure differentials drive the me
tabolic production and exchange of disc substances. Conditions of high
or low disc pressure secondary to spinal instrumentation may serve as
the impetus for altered metabolic exchange and predispose operative a
nd adjacent levels to disc pathology.