Ja. Fearon et G. Millicovsky, COMPARISON OF CRANIOFACIAL GROWTH AFTER RIGID FIXATION WITH AUTOGENOUS BONE PLATES AND WITH METAL PLATES, Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 93(4), 1994, pp. 697-702
This study was undertaken to determine whether rigid fixation using au
togenous cranial bone grafts restricts craniofacial growth less than m
etal plates in 7-week-old Yorkshire pigs. A rectangular 10 X 20 mm seg
ment of bone centered on the right coronal suture was resected. Animal
s were randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups: (1) rigi
d fixation across the defect using the bone graft rotated 90 degrees a
nd attached with four microscrews; (2) rigid fixation across the defec
t using two microplates attached with four microscrews; or (3) no rigi
d fixation, with four microscrews placed to serve as radiologic marker
s. All animals were followed up with serial radiographs, and 8 months
after the surgery direct measurements were performed on dry skull prep
arations. The greatest lengths were in the control group, followed by
the bone plate and then the metal plate groups, but these differences
were not statistically significant. The cranial width was significantl
y greater in the bone plate group, suggesting that a growth center may
have been reoriented.