DYN-FO - A PARALLEL, DYNAMIC COMPLEXITY CLASS

Citation
S. Patnaik et N. Immerman, DYN-FO - A PARALLEL, DYNAMIC COMPLEXITY CLASS, Journal of computer and system sciences, 55(2), 1997, pp. 199-209
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
System Science","Computer Science Hardware & Architecture","Computer Science Theory & Methods
ISSN journal
00220000
Volume
55
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
199 - 209
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-0000(1997)55:2<199:D-APDC>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Traditionally, computational complexity has considered only static pro blems. Classical complexity classes such as NC, P, and NP are defined in terms of the complexity of checking-upon presentation of an entire input-whether the input satisfies a certain property. For many applica tions of computers it is more appropriate to model the process as a dy namic one. There is a fairly large object being worked on over a perio d of time. The object is repeatedly modified by users and computations are performed. We develop a theory of dynamic complexity. We study th e new complexity class, dynamic first-order logic ( Dyn-FO). This is t he set of properties that can be maintained and queried in first-order logic, i.e., relational calculus, on a relational database. We show t hat many interesting properties are in Dyn-FO, including multiplicatio n, graph connectivity, bipartiteness. and the computation of minimum s panning trees. Note that none of these problems is in static FO, and t his fact has been used to justify increasing the power of query langua ges beyond first-order. It is thus striking that these problems are in deed dynamic first-order and, thus, were computable in first-order dat abase languages all along. We also define ''bounded-expansion reductio ns'' which honor dynamic complexity classes. We prove that certain sta ndard complete problems for static complexity classes, such as REACH(a ) for P, remain complete via these new reductions. On the other hand, we prove that other such problems, including REACH for NL and REACH(d) for L, are no longer complete via bounded-expansion reductions. Furth ermore, we show that a version of REACH,, called REACH(a)(+), is not i n Dyn-FO unless all of P is contained in parallel linear time. (C) 199 7 Academic Press.