COSTS OF AN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT-BASED ACCELERATED DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOL VS HOSPITALIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH CHEST PAIN - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Citation
Rr. Roberts et al., COSTS OF AN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT-BASED ACCELERATED DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOL VS HOSPITALIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH CHEST PAIN - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 278(20), 1997, pp. 1670-1676
Citations number
73
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
00987484
Volume
278
Issue
20
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1670 - 1676
Database
ISI
SICI code
0098-7484(1997)278:20<1670:COAEDA>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Context.-More than 3 million patients are hospitalized yearly in the U nited states for chest pain, The cost is over $3 billion just for thos e found to be free of acute disease, New rapid diagnostic tests for ac ute myocardial infarction (AMI) have resulted in the proliferation of accelerated diagnostic protocols (ADPs) and chest pain observation uni ts. Objective.-To determine whether use of an emergency department (ED )-based ADP can reduce hospital admission rate, total cost, and length of stay (LOS) for patients needing admission for evaluation of chest pain. Design.-Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing admiss ion rate, total cost, and LOS for patients treated using ADP vs inpati ent controls, Total costs were determined using empirically measured r esource utilization and microcosting techniques. Setting.-A large urba n public teaching hospital serving a predominantly African American an d Hispanic population. Patients.-A sample of 165 patients was randomly selected from a larger consecutive sample of 429 patients with chest pain concurrently enrolled in an ADP diagnostic cohort trial, Eligible patients presented to the ED with clinical findings suggestive of AMI or acute cardiac ischemia (ACI) but at low risk using a validated pre dictive algorithm. Main Outcome Measures.-Primary outcomes measured fo r each subject were LOS and total cost of treatment. Results.-The hosp ital admission rate for ADP vs control patients was 45.2% vs 100% (P<. 001). The mean total cost per patient for ADP vs control patients was $1528 vs $2095 (P<.001), The mean LOS measured in hours for ADP vs con trol patients was 33.1 hours vs 44.8 hours (P<.01). Conclusions.-In th is trial, ADP saved $567 in total hospital costs per patient treated, Use of ED-based ADPs can reduce hospitalization rates, LOS, and total cost for low-risk patients with chest pain needing evaluation for poss ible AMI or ACI.