Anthropologists inspired by the works of Michel Foucault have describe
d development as a discourse imposed on the Third World by powerful we
stern institutions. In defining the power of such agencies (especially
the World Bank) these authors focus not on the practices of actors or
sets of actors, but rather on the ability of such institutions to sha
pe perceptions of Third World peoples and to limit ways of thinking ab
out the world and imagining change. While the focus on language Is hel
pful to understanding how development agendas are ''deployed'' through
out the world many critics overlook the important role of local elite
groups as well as the agency of development's ''target populations.''
The uses of, and popular responses to, ''sustainable development'' and
other development strategies in Bogota, Colombia, show that the devel
opment discourse is neither so monolithic nor so hegemonic as some cri
tics suggest. Because of sustainable development's vague mandate and i
mprecise terminology, it has been easily manipulated and rewritten at
the local level.