Much has been written about the threats to medical schools and teachin
g hospitals, but less attention has been given to what these changes m
ean to the individuals who lead these institutions. In the belief that
the quality of leadership of academic medical centers, especially med
ical schools, will help determine the future of these institutions, th
e author assesses the situation of deans today. He first discusses the
dramatic decrease in the tenures of deans over the last 20 years and
reviews the evidence for some of the possible reasons that this has ha
ppened, such as possible changes in the personal characteristics of de
ans (not a factor), their salaries (not a factor), the inflated titles
and increasing Fewer of deans, and the greatly expanded sizes of the
operations that deans now govern (caused by the enormous increase in t
he health care establishment and corresponding increases in medical sc
hools). However, the author maintains that these reasons do not suffic
iently account for the ''administrative distress'' that has affected t
he deanery. Causes for such distress include expectations that are too
high, a constituency that is too broadly based, the dean's stunted in
tellectual life, unreasonable boundaries, a level of authority not com
mensurate with responsibility, and a faculty prone to second-guessing.
The author concludes by stating that the dean must set the agenda for
action by the medical school indicates some main items of that agenda
(such as promoting diversity in the physician workforce), and then of
fers a variety of ''personal tips'' to help deans survive, such as get
ting a good administrative assistant, talking to people one-on-one, nd
following up on whatever one does. He ends on a lighter note with adv
ice to deans for personal survival, such as taking breaks, rationing t
ravel, and planning for life after deaning.