Analyses of the costs and benefits of asynchronous communication, and
the complementary properties of writing and speech, are used to predic
t that messages containing both writing and speech will be more commun
icative than either medium alone. Two experimental studies of asynchro
nous messaging are presented. Both experiments examine the use of pen-
and-voice messages, that is voice messages attached to 'scribbled', i.
e., uninterpreted text. The control conditions were voice messages alo
ne, equivalent to an answerphone, and scribbled messages alone, equiva
lent to a fax. In Experiment 1 the visual component of the pen-and-voi
ce messages was static, in Experiment 2 users could record short 'movi
es' including speech and pen movements over a document surface, Users
showed a significant preference for the pen-and-voice messages in both
experiments. In Experiment 2 half the number of pen-and-voice message
s were required to achieve the same task performance as in the control
conditions. It is concluded that dynamic pen-and-voice messages have
considerable potential advantages over current single medium asynchron
ous communication facilities such as fax, answerphone, voicemail and e
-mail.