LIFE-STYLES AND HEALTH RISKS OF COLLEGIATE ATHLETES - A MULTICENTER STUDY

Citation
A. Nattiv et al., LIFE-STYLES AND HEALTH RISKS OF COLLEGIATE ATHLETES - A MULTICENTER STUDY, Clinical journal of sport medicine, 7(4), 1997, pp. 262-272
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Sport Sciences",Orthopedics,Physiology
ISSN journal
1050642X
Volume
7
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
262 - 272
Database
ISI
SICI code
1050-642X(1997)7:4<262:LAHROC>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether college athletes are at greater risk f or maladaptive lifestyle and health-risk behaviors than their nonathle tic peers and to identify high risk taking groups by gender, sport, an d other identifiers. Design: Multicenter, cross-sectional study. Setti ng: Seven major geographically represented collegiate institutions in the United States. Participants: A total of 2,298 college athletes and 683 randomized nonathlete controls completed a confidential survey qu estionnaire between the summer of 1993 and winter of 1994, assessing l ifestyle and health-risk behaviors over the previous 12 months. Main o utcome measures: Self-reports of lifestyle behaviors and health risks in the following areas: motor-vehicle safety, substance abuse, sexuall y transmitted diseases and contraception, mental health, cancer preven tion, nutrition, exercise and general preventive health issues. Result s: Athletes demonstrated significantly higher risk-taking behaviors (p < 0.05) than their nonathlete peers in the following areas: less like ly always to use seatbelts; less likely always to use helmets with mot orcycles, mopeds, and bicycles: more often drive as a passenger with a driver under the influence of alcohol or drugs: greater quantity and frequency of alcoholic beverages; greater frequency of smokeless tobac co and anabolic steroid use; less-safe sex; greater number of sexual p artners; less contraceptive use: and more involvement in physical figh ts. Female athletes reported a higher prevalence of irregular menses, amenorrhea, and stress fractures compared with female nonathletes. Mal e athletes had more risk-taking behaviors than did female athletes (p < 0.05), and athletes in contact sports demonstrated more risk-taking behaviors than did athletes in noncontact sports (p < 0.05). Athletes with one risk-taking behavior were likely to have multiple risk-taking behaviors (p < 0.05). Conclusions: College athletes appear to be at h igher risk than their nonathletic peers for certain maladaptive lifest yle behaviors. Athlete subgroups at highest risk include male athletes and athletes participating in contact sports. Athletes at risk for on e high-risk behavior demonstrated an increased risk for multiple risk- taking behaviors. Preventive health interventions deserve further stud y to determine strategies for risk reduction in high-risk groups.