Tj. Velte et Rf. Miller, SPIKING AND NONSPIKING MODELS OF STARBURST AMACRINE CELLS IN THE RABBIT RETINA, Visual neuroscience, 14(6), 1997, pp. 1073-1088
The integrative properties of starburst amacrine cells in the rabbit r
etina were studied with compartmental models and computer-simulation t
echniques. The anatomical basis for these simulations was provided by
computer reconstructions of intracellularly stained starburst amacrine
cells and published data on dendritic diameter and biophysical proper
ties. Passive and active membrane properties were included to simulate
spiking and nonspiking behavior. Simulated synaptic inputs into one o
r more compartments consisted of a bipolar-like conductance change wit
h peak and steady-state components provided by the sum of two Gaussian
responses. Simulated impulse generation was achieved by using a model
of impulse generation that included five nonlinear channels (I-Na, I-
Ca, I-A, I-K, I-K,I-Ca). The magnitude of the sodium channel conductan
ce change was altered to meet several different types of impulse gener
ation and propagation behaviors. We studied a range of model constrain
ts which included variations in membrane resistance (R-m) from 4,000 O
mega.cm(2) to 100,000 Omega.cm(2), and dendritic diameter from 0.1 to
0.3 mu m. In a separate series of simulations, we studied the feasibil
ity of voltage-clamping starburst amacrine cells using a soma-applied,
single-electrode voltage clamp, based on models with and without dend
ritic and somatic spiking behavior. Our simulation studies suggest tha
t single dendrites of starburst amacrine cells can behave as independe
nt functional subunits when the R-m is high, provided that one or a sm
all number of dendrites is synaptically co-activated. However, as the
number of co-activated dendrites increases, the starburst cell behavio
r becomes more uniform and independent dendritic function is less prev
alent. The presence of impulse activity in the dendrites raises new qu
estions about dendritic function. However, dendritic impulses do not n
ecessarily eliminate independent dendritic function, because dendritic
impulses commonly fail as they propagate toward the soma, where they
contribute EPSP-like responses which summate with conventional synapti
c currents.