Rn. Turner et al., SELECTIVE POTENTIATION OF LOMETREXOL GROWTH-INHIBITION BY DIPYRIDAMOLE THROUGH CELL-SPECIFIC INHIBITION OF HYPOXANTHINE SALVAGE, British Journal of Cancer, 76(10), 1997, pp. 1300-1307
The novel antifolate lometrexol (5,10-dideazatetrahydrofolate) inhibit
s de novo purine biosynthesis, and cc-incubation with hypoxanthine abo
lishes its cytotoxicity. The prevention of hypoxanthine rescue from an
antipurine antifolate by the nucleoside transport inhibitor dipyridam
ole was investigated for the first time in nine human and rodent cell
lines from seven different tissues of origin, In A549, HeLa and CHO ce
lls, dipyridamole prevented hypoxanthine rescue and so growth was inhi
bited by the combination of lometrexol, dipyridamole and hypoxanthine,
but in HT29, HCT116, KK47, MDA231, CCRF CEM and L1210 cells dipyridam
ole had no effect and the combination did not inhibit growth. Dipyrida
mole inhibited hypoxanthine uptake in A549 but not in CCRF CEM cells.
Dipyridamole prevented the hypoxanthine-induced repletion of dGTP pool
s, depleted by lometrexol, in A549 but not in CCRF CEM cells, Thus, th
e selective growth-inhibitory effect of the combination of lometrexol,
dipyridamole and hypoxanthine is apparently due to the dipyridamole s
ensitivity (ds) or insensitivity (di) of hypoxanthine transport. Both
the human and murine leukaemic cells are of the di phenotype. If this
reflects the transport phenotype of normal bone marrow it would sugges
t that the combination of lometrexol, dipyridamole and hypoxanthine mi
ght be selectively toxic to certain tumour types and have reduced toxi
city to the bone marrow.