Many empirical formulas have been proposed in the literature to estima
te the pristine points of zero charge of oxides from ionic radii and c
oordination numbers or from electronegativities, and good correlations
between experimental and calculated values were obtained. The signifi
cance of such studies is limited unless accurate and reliable experime
ntal pristine point of zero charge (PPZC) data are used. Comparison of
various compilations of PPZC data shows that more attention should be
paid to the proper choice of an unique PPZC among the many various va
lues reported for the same oxide in the literature. Only for a few oxi
des (RuO2, TiO2, ZrO2, CeO2, Fe2O3, and Al2O3) can very reliable PPZC
values be accurately selected. For the other oxides the existing liter
ature data still need verification, and for some oxides PPZC data are
not available at all. In order to add more oxides to this list, an att
empt to determine the pristine points of zero charge of Nb2O5, Ta2O5,
and HfO2 was made. For Nb2O5 the point of zero charge and isoelectric
point exactly match at pH 4.1, and this value coincides with literatur
e data. This result fills a critical gap in the listing of PPZC values
; namely, this is one of very few reliable PPZC values in the acidic r
ange. For Ta2O5 the point of zero charge at pH 5.2 and the isoelectric
point at pH 5.3 in the presence of NaClO4 obtained in the present stu
dy are also consistent, but the literature data are very scattered and
most of them fall at considerably lower pH values. For HfO2 the point
of zero charge at pH 7.4 and the isoelectric point at pH 7.1 in the p
resence of NaClO4 were obtained in the present study. The difference b
etween these values is too significant to claim a reliable PPZC.