INFLUENCE OF 2 BLOOD CONSERVATION TECHNIQUES (CARDIOTOMY RESERVOIR VERSUS CELL-SAVER) ON BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF THE HEPARIN-COATED CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS CIRCUIT DURING CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION SURGERY
Jw. Borowiec et al., INFLUENCE OF 2 BLOOD CONSERVATION TECHNIQUES (CARDIOTOMY RESERVOIR VERSUS CELL-SAVER) ON BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF THE HEPARIN-COATED CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS CIRCUIT DURING CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION SURGERY, Journal of cardiac surgery, 12(3), 1997, pp. 190-197
Blood conservation during cardiac surgery is critically important beca
use of the inherent risks in homologous blood transfusions. Two techni
ques for the intraoperative conservation of blood-retransfusion of the
red cells using a cell-saver (CS), or retransfusion of the blood usin
g a cardiotomy suction (CTR) system-were compared using biocompatibili
ty markers, granulocyte activation, and production of oxygen-free radi
cals (OFR). In the CTR group, heparin coated circuits with an uncoated
cardiotomy reservoir were used. For the CS group, identical heparin c
oated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) sets, without a cardiotomy reservoi
r but with a CS, were used. In each group, eight patients had coronary
artery bypass grafting performed. The capacity of the whole blood and
the granulocytes to produce OFR was estimated by a chemiluminescence,
and granulocyte activation was measured as release of the granulocyte
granule proteins myeloperoxidase (MPO) and lactoferrin. A significant
ly reduced capacity to produce OFR by the whole blood was noted at 45
minutes of CPB in the CTR group (68% +/- 17% vs 94% +/- 16% in the CS
group). MPO release was higher after 3 hours (p = 0.05) and 20 hours (
p < 0.05), postoperatively, in the CTR group (417 +/- 77 mu g/L and 25
7 +/- 31 mu g/L vs 246 +/- 25 mu g/L and 164 +/- 12 mu g/L, respective
ly, in the CS group). We conclude that the heparin coated CPB circuit
with the uncoated cardiotomy reservoir may be less biocompatible than
the identical CPB set used together with the CS.