Yz. Zhang et al., TISSUE-RESPONSE TO COMMERCIAL SILICONE AND POLYURETHANE ELASTOMERS AFTER DIFFERENT STERILIZATION PROCEDURES, Biomaterials, 17(23), 1996, pp. 2265-2272
Two different commercial polymeric materials, a silicone and a polyure
thane (PUR), were studied with regard to correlations between the chem
ical and physical compositions of the polymer surfaces and the biologi
cal response on implantation. Test specimens of the materials were man
ufactured according to standard procedures. The specimens were implant
ed in rats for 10 and 90 days. Before implantation the polymers were s
terilized in three different ways, namely, beta irradiation, ethylene
oxide sterilization and steam sterilization. The polymers were charact
erized before and after the implantation with respect to the chemical
composition and the morphology of the surfaces. After implantation the
biological response was evaluated by counting numbers of macrophages,
giant cells, fibroblasts and other cells present at the surfaces. The
thickness of the fibrous capsule surrounding the test specimens was m
easured at the thickest and thinnest parts. PUR surfaces showed signs
of degradation already after sterilization and after 10 to 90 days of
implantation, pits and cracks appeared, especially in the ethylene oxi
de sterilized samples. However, differences in the biological response
s were small and independent of the sterilization method. After 10 day
s of implantation the capsule thickness and the amounts of cell materi
al adhering at the surfaces were different, and it appears that the si
licone rubber induces more tissue response than PUR. The differences i
n the early tissue response evened out after 90 days implantation time
and a steady state situation evolved, which was similar for the silic
one and the polyurethane. (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Limited.