The unavailability of the experiencer reading of English have when its
subject is coindexed with a logophor in the complement is shown to be
the result of a particular licensing condition on the experiencer and
locative readings of have. The experiencer or location subject of hav
e must bind a [+R] variable in its complement. Logophors, while variab
les, are not [+R] in the binding theory as presented in Reinhart and R
euland (1993); hence the experiencer or location reading is not licens
ed. More broadly, the result supports the proposals of Ritter and Rose
n (1997) and Belvin (1993, 1996) that have is a predicate whose interp
retation depends upon the nature of and relations between its argument
s.