M. Mullerschimpfle et al., MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASOUND - WHICH EXAMIN ATION SEQUENCE IS PREFERABLE, RoFo. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der neuenbildgebenden Verfahren, 167(4), 1997, pp. 348-354
Purpose: To compare primary mammography diagnosis (ultrasound report a
vailable) with primary ultrasound diagnosis (mammography report availa
ble). Methods: 89 preoperative patients with suspicious lesions were i
ncluded. Mammography and ultrasound of all patients were evaluated by
two independent experienced readers under clinical conditions. The rep
orts of the complementary modality were available to both observers. L
esion evaluation was done on a per breast basis, in cases of multiple
lesions in respect of the lesion with the greatest risk of malignancy.
Results: 39 benign and 59 malignant lesions were found. Primary mammo
graphy and primary ultrasound yielded 3 and 8 false positives and 10 a
nd 13 false negatives. Concerning the palpable lesions (n=59), primary
mammography and primary ultrasound had no and 4 false positives and 7
and 8 false negatives, respectively, for the non palpable lesions, th
e figures were 3 and 4 false positives and 3 and 5 false negatives. Co
nclusions: Mammography remains the method of first choice in early det
ection of breast cancer, whereas breast ultrasound should be performed
after and in knowledge of the mammogram, in consideration of the know
n indications (equivocal palpable lesion and mammographic opacity, den
se breast).