ECONOMIC-EVALUATION OF 3 ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR CONTROL OF THE MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT-FLY (DIPTERA, TEPHRITIDAE) IN ISRAEL, PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES, AND JORDAN
W. Enkerlin et J. Mumford, ECONOMIC-EVALUATION OF 3 ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR CONTROL OF THE MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT-FLY (DIPTERA, TEPHRITIDAE) IN ISRAEL, PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES, AND JORDAN, Journal of economic entomology, 90(5), 1997, pp. 1066-1072
The Mediterranean fruit ny, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann), is a major
pest of fruit crops in the Mediterranean Basin countries. If no contr
ol measures are applied in Israel, Palestinian Territories, and Jordan
against this pest, the annual fruit losses are estimated to be about
U.S. $365 million, which is more than half the total revenue produced
by fruits considered to be Mediterranean fruit fly hosts in these coun
tries. Under the current control programs, the direct damage (yield lo
ss and control costs) and indirect damage (environmental impact and ma
rket loss) amount to U.S. $192 million per year. This amount could inc
rease each year if the current control programs are kept. The aim of t
his study was to evaluate, on a regional basis, the economic returns o
f 3 improved alternative Mediterranean fruit fly control methods using
a 9-yr time frame. The control alternatives include population suppre
ssion using bait sprays, population suppression using massive release
of sterile male flies, and population eradication also using massive r
eleases of sterile male flies. For each option, an action plan was pre
pared which includes intensity, frequency and timing of sampling (trap
ping and fruit gathering), control (bait sprays and sterile male relea
ses), and postcontrol (quarantine and emergency capacity) techniques.
For the economic evaluation costs and benefits at net present value ar
e computed for each control option to estimate the economic indices. R
esults indicate that the 3 area-wide control options are technically a
nd economically feasible and all are better than the current control p
rograms. For each option, the economic returns on a medium and long te
rm are discussed, along with the environmental impact. Over the 9-yr t
ime frame, the greatest economic return is from the sterile male suppr
ession option. Over a much longer time frame, the greatest return is f
or the sterile male eradication option.