D. Blumberg et al., INTERACTIONS AMONG HELICOVERPA-ARMIGERA (LEPIDOPTERA, NOCTUIDAE), ITSLARVAL ENDOPARASITOID MICROPLITIS-CROCEIPES (HYMENOPTERA, BRACONIDAE), AND BACILLUS-THURINGIENSIS, Journal of economic entomology, 90(5), 1997, pp. 1181-1186
Interactions among Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), its larval endoparas
itoid Microplitis croceipes (Cresson), and Bacillus thuringiensis Berl
iner were evaluated under laboratory conditions. Prefeeding H. armiger
a with lethal concentrations (0.08 and 0.16 mg/g) of Dipel (B. thuring
iensis subsp, kurstaki strain HD-1) did not prevent M. croceipes from
ovipositing in the infected host larvae. Development of parasitoid imm
atures in host larvae prefed for 24 or 48 h with the dietary B. thurin
giensis was not adversely affected. However, feeding on the same diets
for 72 h was detrimental to the parasitoid because of premature host
mortality. Continuous exposure of H. armigera larvae to the diets at d
ifferent time intervals after parasitization (0, 4, or 6 d), prevented
successful development and pupation of M. croceipes, mainly caused by
early mortality of the host. Feeding parasitoid adults with B. thurin
giensis preparations of subsp. kurstaki strain HD-73 mixed in honey wa
s not harmful to the wasps. Moreover, Dipel or purified B. thuringiens
is spores of HD-73, but not purified crystals of this strain, increase
d longevity of the wasps compared with the control (honey alone). Micr
oscopic observations and color indications showed that the adult paras
itoid ingested the honey with the Dipel. The incompatibilities between
application of B. thuringiensis to host larvae and parasitization wit
h M. croceipes are discussed with regard to combining microbial and en
tomophagous control strategies against H. armigera.