M. Tighe et al., AUDIT OF A RURAL HOSPITALS CORONARY-CARE UNIT - COMPARISON OF 2 PREDICTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION MORTALITY, Irish journal of medical science, 165(4), 1996, pp. 254-258
The purpose of the study was to compare observed mortality of a rural
hospital coronary care unit with mortality rates estimated by two pred
ictive instruments of mortality. The mortality rates of 86 consecutive
patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction were compared wit
h those predicted by the presence or absence of eight risk factors for
mortality identified by the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TI
MI) trial, and mortality predicted by a logistic regression equation L
RE). Seventeen patients (20 per cent) died within 6 weeks of admission
; the number of TIMI risk factors present predicted a mortality of 9.8
per cent, and the instrument of Selker's predicted a mortality of 25.
9 per cent, Patients with 3 TIMI risk factors had a significantly high
er mortality than predicted (46.2 versus 13.0 per cent, p<0.01). There
were no significant differences between the receiver operating charac
teristic (ROC) curve of either instrument. The predictions of Selker's
instrument, however, showed no significant difference from observed m
ortality, even when the patients were grouped into quintiles, and the
predicted mortality rates were corrected for any presumed benefit from
thrombolysis. The predictive instrument of Selker more consistently e
stimates observed mortality than the presence of risk factors identifi
ed by the TIMI trial.