THE CASSINI MISSION PROBABILISTIC RISK ANALYSIS - COMPARISON OF 2 PROBABILISTIC DYNAMIC METHODOLOGIES

Citation
S. Swaminathan et al., THE CASSINI MISSION PROBABILISTIC RISK ANALYSIS - COMPARISON OF 2 PROBABILISTIC DYNAMIC METHODOLOGIES, Reliability engineering & systems safety, 58(1), 1997, pp. 1-14
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Operatione Research & Management Science","Engineering, Industrial
ISSN journal
09518320
Volume
58
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1 - 14
Database
ISI
SICI code
0951-8320(1997)58:1<1:TCMPRA>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
This paper describes a comparison between two dynamic methodologies us ed in the probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) of the Cassini Mission. Th e main Cassini PRA was performed by Lockheed Martin. A combination of Monte Carlo algorithms and event-tree logic was used to perform the st udy. Results were validated using an alternative method, the Discrete Dynamic Event Tree (DDET) methodology. Two major conclusions of the pa per are 1) performing a dynamic PRA of large scale 'real-life' systems is feasible and 2) given the same ground rules and assumptions, two d ynamic methodologies would give the same results. (C) 1997 Published b y Elsevier Science Limited.