THE EFFECTS OF NEUROTOXIC LESIONS OF THE PERIRHINAL CORTEX COMBINED TO FORNIX TRANSECTION ON OBJECT RECOGNITION MEMORY IN THE RAT

Citation
A. Ennaceur et Jp. Aggleton, THE EFFECTS OF NEUROTOXIC LESIONS OF THE PERIRHINAL CORTEX COMBINED TO FORNIX TRANSECTION ON OBJECT RECOGNITION MEMORY IN THE RAT, Behavioural brain research, 88(2), 1997, pp. 181-193
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
01664328
Volume
88
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
181 - 193
Database
ISI
SICI code
0166-4328(1997)88:2<181:TEONLO>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
The effects of lesions centred in the perirhinal cortex region (Prh) o r in both the perirhinal cortex region and the fornix (Prh + Fx) were assessed in two different working memory tasks, one spatial the other nonspatial. For the spatial task the rats were tested in an eight arm radial maze, using a standard procedure in which they were rewarded fo r avoiding previously visited arms. The Prh + Fx, but not the Prh, rat s produced significantly more errors (re-entries) and these started si gnificantly earlier in each session when compared with a surgical cont rol group. The nonspatial task was a test of spontaneous object recogn ition in which rats were tested on their ability to discriminate betwe en a familiar and a novel object. For the initial tests the Prh group failed to discriminate between the objects, but the Prh + Fx group sho wed a clear preference for the novel object. Observation of the test s howed, however, that the Prh + Fx group were spending a greater length of time initially exploring the sample (familiar) object. When the am ount of exposure to the sample object was limited to either 20 or 40 s (i.e. was the same for all three groups), the Prh + Fx group now fail ed to discriminate between the two objects. This change was especially evident for shorter sample duration (20 s). The Prh group did, howeve r, show an amelioration of their deficit with this further testing. Th e present results support previous dissociation between spatial and no nspatial working memory, and indicate that there may be some recovery of function following perirhinal cortical damage. (C) 1997 Elsevier Sc ience B.V.