STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL-CHARACTERIZATION OF RETINAL CALCIUM-DEPENDENT GUANYLATE-CYCLASE ACTIVATOR PROTEIN (CD-GCAP) - IDENTITY WITH S100-BETA PROTEIN
N. Pozdnyakov et al., STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL-CHARACTERIZATION OF RETINAL CALCIUM-DEPENDENT GUANYLATE-CYCLASE ACTIVATOR PROTEIN (CD-GCAP) - IDENTITY WITH S100-BETA PROTEIN, Biochemistry, 36(46), 1997, pp. 14159-14166
Calcium-dependent guanylate cyclase activator protein (CD-GCAP) is a l
ow-molecular-weight retinal calcium-binding protein which activates ro
d outer segment guanylate cyclase (ROS-GC) in a calcium-dependent mann
er. This investigation was undertaken to determine the protein's struc
ture and identity. Partial amino acid sequencing (72% of the protein),
mass spectral analysis, cloning, and immunological studies revealed t
hat CD-GCAP is identical to S100 beta, another law-molecular-weight ca
lcium-binding protein whose structure was known. We had shown earlier
that the latter protein, which is usually called S100b (S100 beta beta
or dimer of S100 beta), also activates ROS-GC but that the V-max of a
ctivated cyclase was about 50% lower than when stimulated by CD-GCAP.
S100b also required about 15 times more calcium (3.2 x 10(-5) vs 1.5 x
10(-6) M) for half-maximal stimulation of cyclase. To investigate the
possibility that CD-GCAP is a post-translationally modified form of S
100b, both proteins were treated with I M hydroxylamine which is known
to deacylate proteins. After the treatment, CD-GCAP did not activate
cyclase while S100b activation remained unaffected suggesting that CD-
GCAP could not be a modified form of S100b. Hydroxylamine also broke d
own CD-GCAP into smaller fragments while leaving S100b intact. It ther
efore appeared that in spite of identical primary structures, the conf
ormations of the two proteins were different. We then investigated the
possibility that the purification procedures of the two proteins, whi
ch were quite different, could have contributed to such conformational
differences: CD-GCAP purification included a step of heating at 75 de
grees C in 5 mM Ca, while S100b purification included zinc affinity ch
romatography. To test the influence of these treatments on the propert
ies of the proteins, CD-GCAP was subjected to zinc affinity chromatogr
aphy and purified as S100b (CD-GCAP-->S100b) and S100b was heated in C
a and purified as CD-GCAP (S100b-->CD-GCAP). Cyclase activation, calci
um-sensitivity, and hydroxylamine-lability measurements revealed that
CD-GCAP S100b is identical to S100b and that S100b-->CD-GCAP is identi
cal to CD-GCAP. Taken together the results demonstrate that CD-GCAP an
d S100b are one and the same protein and that their functional differe
nces are due to different interconvertible conformational states.