Jc. Helton et al., CONCEPTUAL BASIS OF A SYSTEMS PRIORITIZATION METHODOLOGY FOR THE WASTE ISOLATION PILOT-PLANT, Reliability engineering & systems safety, 57(3), 1997, pp. 203-222
Citations number
47
Categorie Soggetti
Operatione Research & Management Science","Engineering, Industrial
A systems prioritization methodology (SPM) is under development at San
dia National Laboratories (SNL) to provide guidance to the US Departme
nt of Energy (DOE) on experimental programs and design modifications t
o be supported in the development of a successful compliance certifica
tion application to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for t
he Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) for the geologic disposal of tra
nsuranic (TRU) waste. The purpose of the SPM is to determine the proba
bilities that the implementation of different combinations of experime
ntal programs and design modifications, referred to as activity sets,
will lead to compliance with 40 CFR 191, Subparts B and C (Environment
al Radiation Protection Standards for the Management and Disposal of S
pent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Waste) and 40 CFR 268.6
(Petitions to Allow Land Disposal of a Waste Prohibited under Subpart
C of Part 268, which implements the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act, i.e., RCRA). Appropriate tradeoffs between compliance probabilit
y, implementation cost and implementation time can then be made in the
selection of the activity set to be supported in the development of a
licensing application. Determination of compliance probabilities for
individual activity sets involves probability spaces for (1) possible
outcomes of the experimental programs, (2) uncertainty in analysis inp
ut given specific experimental outcomes and (3) possible future occurr
ences at the WIPP, and also models for (1) fluid flow in the vicinity
of the repository, (2) radionuclide release from the repository due to
flowing groundwater, (3) groundwater flow and radionuclide transport
in geologic formations overlying the repository, (4) radionuclide rele
ase to the surface environment due to cuttings and spallings removal i
n the event of a drilling intrusion and (5) transport of RCRA contamin
ants in gas and brine. Descriptions are given for the conceptual struc
ture of the SPM and the manner in which this structure determines the
computational implementation of an example SPM application. Due to the
sophisticated structure of the SPM and the computational demands of m
any of its components, the overall computational structure must be org
anized carefully to provide the compliance probabilities for the large
number of activity sets under consideration at an acceptable computat
ional cost. Conceptually, the determination of each compliance probabi
lity is equivalent to a large numerical integration problem. Published
by Elsevier Science Limited.