Cy. Zhang et Fg. Zeng, LOUDNESS OF DYNAMIC STIMULI IN ACOUSTIC AND ELECTRIC HEARING, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102(5), 1997, pp. 2925-2934
Traditional loudness models have been based on the average energy and
the critical band analysis of steady-state sounds. However, most envir
onmental sounds, including speech, are dynamic stimuli, in which the a
verage level [e.g., the root-mean-square (rms) level] does not account
for the large temporal fluctuations. The question addressed here was
whether two stimuli of the same rms level but different peak levels wo
uld produce an equal loudness sensation. A modern adaptive procedure w
as used to replicate two classic experiments demonstrating that the se
nsation of ''beats'' in a two-or three-tone complex resulted in a loud
er sensation [E. Zwicker and H. Fastl, Psychoacoustics-Facts and Model
s (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990)]. Two additional experiments were co
nducted to study exclusively the effects of the temporal envelope on t
he loudness sensation of dynamic stimuli. Loudness balance was perform
ed by normal-hearing listeners between a white noise and a sinusoidall
y amplitude-modulated noise in one experiment, and by cochlear implant
listeners between two harmonic stimuli of the same magnitude spectra,
but different phase spectra, in the other experiment. The results fro
m both experiments showed that, for two stimuli of the same rms level,
the stimulus with greater temporal fluctuations sometimes produced a
significantly louder sensation, depending on the temporal frequency an
d overall stimulus level. In normal-hearing listeners, the louder sens
ation was produced for the amplitude-modulated stimuli with modulation
frequencies lower than 400 Hz, and gradually disappeared above 400 Hz
, resulting in a low-pass filtering characteristic which bore some sim
ilarity to the temporal modulation transfer function. The extent to wh
ich loudness was greater was a nonmonotonic function of level in acous
tic hearing and a monotonically increasingly function in electric hear
ing. These results suggest that the loudness sensation of a dynamic st
imulus is not limited to a 100-ms temporal integration process, and ma
y be determined jointly by a compression process in the cochlea and an
expansion process in the brain. A level-dependent compression scheme
that may better restore normal loudness of dynamic stimuli in hearing
aids and cochlear implants is proposed. (C) 1997 Acoustical Society of
America.