Hj. Grundmann et al., MULTICENTER STUDY USING STANDARDIZED PROTOCOLS AND REAGENTS FOR EVALUATION OF REPRODUCIBILITY OF PCR-BASED FINGERPRINTING OF ACINETOBACTER SPP, Journal of clinical microbiology, 35(12), 1997, pp. 3071-3077
Seven laboratories in six European countries examined 40 isolates belo
nging to the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii compl
ex to investigate whether standardized protocols and quality-controlle
d reagents could produce reliable, discriminatory, and reproducible PC
R-based fingerprinting results, Four PCR protocols with different prim
ers (primers DAF4, ERIC-2, M13, and REP1 + REP2) were used. The epidem
iological conclusions reached by the participating laboratories were s
ubstantially correct, with 96.4% of the total isolate grouping allocat
ions agreeing with the consensus view, All laboratories identified the
main epidemiological clusters, and each laboratory also identified tw
o non-outbreak-related isolates. There were no significant differences
between the isolate grouping results obtained by the different protoc
ols and with the different primers, Visual comparison indicated that t
he standardized protocols and reagents yielded reproducible fingerprin
t patterns, but with some variations in particular band intensities. M
inor variations in fingerprint profiles were detected, but computer-as
sisted analysis of PCR fingerprints obtained on agarose gels demonstra
ted that 88.3 to 91.6% (depending on the source of DNA) of the pattern
s clustered correctly, while 96.4 to 98.9% of the patterns clustered c
orrectly following automated high-resolution laser fluorescence analys
is. Correlation of the patterns for isogenic isolates ranged from 83.3
to 86.6% but was slightly better (mean correlation, 87.1%) for centra
lly prepared DNA extracts than for DNA extracts prepared by individual
laboratories (mean correlation, 84.7%). It was concluded that indepen
dently produced PCR fingerprint patterns can be obtained reproducibly
for Acinetobacter spp. at the practical level if (i) quality-controlle
d reagents, (ii) standardized extraction of DNA, and (iii) standardize
d amplification conditions are used.