DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE OF THE STRAND DISPLACEMENT AMPLIFICATION METHOD COMPARED TO THOSE OF ROCHE AMPLICOR PCR AND CULTURE FOR DETECTING MYCOBACTERIA IN SPUTUM SAMPLES
S. Ichiyama et al., DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE OF THE STRAND DISPLACEMENT AMPLIFICATION METHOD COMPARED TO THOSE OF ROCHE AMPLICOR PCR AND CULTURE FOR DETECTING MYCOBACTERIA IN SPUTUM SAMPLES, Journal of clinical microbiology, 35(12), 1997, pp. 3082-3085
We compared the ability of the semiautomated BDProbeTec-SDA system, wh
ich uses the strand displacement amplification (SDA) method, with that
of the Recite Amplicor-PCR system and the Septi-Chek AFB culture syst
em to directly detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTB) and oth
er mycobacteria in sputum samples. A total of 530 sputum samples from
299 patients were examined in this study. Of the 530 samples, 129 were
culture positive for acid-fast bacilli with the Septi-Chek AFB system
; 95 for MTB, 29 for,ll. avium-M. intracellulare complex (MAC), and 5
for other mycobacteria. The BDProbeTec-SDA system detected 90 of the 9
5 samples culture positive for MTB (sensitivity, 94.7%), and the Ampli
cor-PCR system detected 85 of the 95 samples culture positive for RITE
(sensitivity, 89.5%). The specificity of each system, based on the cl
inical diagnosis, was 99.8% for SDA and 100% for PCR, respectively. Am
ong the 29 samples culture positive for ILIAC, the BDProbeTec-SDA syst
em detected MAC in 24 samples (sensitivity, 82.8%), whereas the Amplic
or-PCR system detected MAC in 24 samples (sensitivity, 79.3%). The spe
cificities of the systems were 98.3 and 100%, respectively. The high d
egrees of sensitivity and specificity of the BDProbeTec-SDA system sug
gest that it should be very useful in clinical laboratories for the ra
pid detection of mycobacteria in sputum samples.