COMPARISON OF PCR, CULTURE, AND HISTOPATHOLOGY FOR DIAGNOSIS OF TUBERCULOUS PERICARDITIS

Citation
Jp. Cegielski et al., COMPARISON OF PCR, CULTURE, AND HISTOPATHOLOGY FOR DIAGNOSIS OF TUBERCULOUS PERICARDITIS, Journal of clinical microbiology, 35(12), 1997, pp. 3254-3257
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
ISSN journal
00951137
Volume
35
Issue
12
Year of publication
1997
Pages
3254 - 3257
Database
ISI
SICI code
0095-1137(1997)35:12<3254:COPCAH>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Nucleic acid amplification techniques for the diagnosis of tuberculosi s (TB) are rapidly being developed, Scant work, however, has focused o n pericardial TB. Using cryopresered specimens from a prior study of p ericarditis, we compared PCR to culture and histopathology for the dia gnosis of tuberculous pericarditis in 36 specimens of pericardial flui d and 19 specimens of pericardial tissue from 20 patients, Fluid and t issue were cultured on Lowenstein-Jensen and Middlebrook solid media a nd in BACTEC radiometric broth, Tissue specimens were stained with hem atoxylin-eosin, Ziehl-Neelsen, auramine O, and Kinyoun stains and were examined for granuloma formation and acid-fast bacilli, PCR was perfo rmed with both fluid and tissue with IS6110-based primers specific for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by published methods. Sixteen of the 20 patients had tuberculous pericarditis and 4 patients had oth er diagnoses, TB was correctly diagnosed by culture in 15 (93%) patien ts, by PCR in 13 (81%) patients, and by histology in 13 of 15 (87%) pa tients, PCR gave one false-positive result for a patient with Staphylo coccus aureus pericarditis. Considering the individual specimens as th e unit of analysis, M. tuberculosis was identified by culture in 30 of 43 specimens (70%) from patients with tuberculous pericarditis and by PCR in 14 of 28 specimens (50%) from patients with tuberculous perica rditis (P > 0.15). The sensitivity of PCR was higher with tissue speci mens (12 of 15; 80%) than with fluid specimens (2 of 13; 15%; P = 0.00 2), Ln conclusion, the overall accuracy of PCR approached tile results of conventional methods, although PCR was much faster, Therefore, PCR merits further development in this regard, The sensitivity of PCR wit h pericardial fluid was poor, and false-positive results with PCR rema in a concern.