Dm. Radack et al., CARPAL-TUNNEL SYNDROME - ARE THE MR FINDINGS A RESULT OF POPULATION SELECTION BIAS, American journal of roentgenology, 169(6), 1997, pp. 1649-1653
OBJECTIVE. Previous descriptions of MR imaging of carpal tunnel syndro
me used limited study populations and volunteers as controls, We reeva
luated these descriptions to determine their sensitivity and specifici
ty when applied to a large consecutive clinical series in which the in
cidence of carpal tunnel syndrome was small. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In
196 consecutive wrists for which supplemental axial conventional spin-
echo T1-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images were obtained a
t 1.5 T with a dedicated wrist coil, 165 studies were available for re
view. Previously described signs of carpal tunnel syndrome such as pro
ximally increased size, flattening of the median nerve, increased medi
an nerve signal intensity, flexor tenosynovitis, retinacular bowing, d
ecreased deep tendon fat, and deep palmar bursitis were retrospectivel
y and independently evaluated by two observers who were unaware of pat
ient diagnosis. RESULTS. None of the previously described signs was se
nsitive for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. However, specific
ity was high for retinacular bowing (94%), median nerve flattening (97
%), and deep palmar bursitis (95%). CONCLUSION. Most previously descri
bed MR imaging signs of carpal tunnel syndrome are insensitive and non
specific. Exceptions include retinacular bowing, median nerve flatteni
ng, and deep palmar bursitis, which in our study proved to have specif
icities greater than or equal to 94%.