The development and evaluation of new drugs often rely on surrogacy. A
n intermediate outcome becomes a surrogate outcome if it fulfils certa
in criteria: it should be easier to measure compared with the clinical
outcome, a statistical relationship should exist between the clinical
outcome and the surrogate outcome, a relation should exist allowing p
rediction of the degree of clinical effect based on tile measured effe
ct on the surrogate outcome. Development and authorization of drugs to
day often rely on so-called surrogate outcomes. Is this use sound? The
validity of such outcomes has been reviewed in different therapeutic
areas: hypertension, venous thromboembolism, AIDS, osteoporosis, hepat
itis C. Based on this review, a pragmatic strategy is proposed which a
llows for the validation and proper use of surrogate outcomes.