PREVALENCE AND DEPTH OF ARTIFICIAL CARIES-LIKE LESIONS ADJACENT TO CAVITIES PREPARED IN ROOTS AND RESTORED WITH A GLASS-IONOMER OR A DENTIN-BONDED COMPOSITE-MATERIAL
Asm. Gilmour et al., PREVALENCE AND DEPTH OF ARTIFICIAL CARIES-LIKE LESIONS ADJACENT TO CAVITIES PREPARED IN ROOTS AND RESTORED WITH A GLASS-IONOMER OR A DENTIN-BONDED COMPOSITE-MATERIAL, Journal of dental research, 76(12), 1997, pp. 1854-1861
One potential advantage of glass-ionomer materials for the treatment o
f root caries is their ability to release fluoride and so resist cario
genic attack. A commercially available composite material has also bee
n reported to release fluoride which reduced caries lesions in the too
th tissue adjacent to it. The aim of this study was to assess the effe
ctiveness of a conventional glass-ionomer restoration compared with a
dentin-bonded, fluoride-releasing, composite restoration when exposed
to a microbial artificial caries system. Artificial caries-like lesion
s produced in relation to the restorations were examined and classifie
d either as outer (surface) lesions or as wall. lesions. A split-unit
experimental design allowed for within-tooth comparisons of the 2 expe
rimental restorations at different sites on the root surface. These we
re either totally within the root surface or positioned at the amelo-c
emental junction. Outer lesion depths were significantly (p < 0.001) s
hallower at all sites adjacent to the glass ionomer when compared with
the composite restorations. Wall lesions were significantly (p < 0.01
) more prevalent adjacent to the composite material. In addition, the
cavity margin position significantly (p < 0.05) affected the incidence
of wall lesions, particularly in the composite group. In conclusion,
glass ionomer was successful in reducing the caries-like lesion produc
tion in the adjacent root surface. This resulted from improved margina
l integrity and fluoride release from this material when compared with
the composite bonding system used.