THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CLINICAL TOOTH STATUS AND RECEIPT OF SEALANTS AMONG CHILD MEDICAID RECIPIENTS

Citation
Va. Robison et al., THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CLINICAL TOOTH STATUS AND RECEIPT OF SEALANTS AMONG CHILD MEDICAID RECIPIENTS, Journal of dental research, 76(12), 1997, pp. 1862-1868
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
ISSN journal
00220345
Volume
76
Issue
12
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1862 - 1868
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-0345(1997)76:12<1862:TRBCTS>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
This study investigated the association between caries status and seal ant need at a prior survey and subsequent sealant use in a Medicaid pr ogram. Clinical data from a 1986-87 statewide epidemiological survey ( N = 8026) representative of North Carolina (NC) schoolchildren (grades K-12) were linked with all NC Medicaid dental claims submitted during 1987-92, yielding 570 children in the survey who had at least one den tal visit during 1987-1992. From the 570, 390 children were included: 71 who received sealants (S) and 319 who received non-sealant care (NS ). Children were excluded based on age, having preexisting sealants, o r having no sealant-eligible molars or premolars. S and NS were compar ed on baseline dfs, DMFS, and sealant need, controlling for the patien t's age, number of visits, and the provider's propensity to seal. At a ll ages, NS was twice as likely to have had prior dfs or DMFS (OR = 2. 04, 95% CI = 1.15, 3.70). The association between sealant receipt and prior sealant need varied by age. At 6 to 11 years, S and NS had equal likelihood of sealant need (OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.62, 3.18). At 12 to 15 years, NS had a greater likelihood of sealant need (OR = 6.82, 95% CI = 1.60, 29.08). Caries-free status was associated with subsequent sealant receipt. Prior sealant need caused variability in dentists' de cisions, depending on the child's age and past caries experience. Seal ants were used infrequently by most providers and for a minority of pa tients. These findings are important for the Medicaid program and for future non-randomized studies of sealant effectiveness.