ACCURACY OF BEDSIDE CHEST HARD-COPY SCREEN-FILM VERSUS HARD-COPY AND SOFT-COPY COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHS IN A MEDICAL INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT - RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS
Hl. Kundel et al., ACCURACY OF BEDSIDE CHEST HARD-COPY SCREEN-FILM VERSUS HARD-COPY AND SOFT-COPY COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHS IN A MEDICAL INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT - RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS, Radiology, 205(3), 1997, pp. 859-863
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical diagnostic accuracy of hard-copy read
ings of screen-film bedside chest radiographs and both hard-and soft-c
opy readings of bedside chest computed radiographs obtained in a medic
al intensive care unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two samples of 95 cases
were assembled from chest images obtained in 541 patients with either
screen-film radiography or computed radiography. The cases were strat
ified according to the clinical problem for which the examination was
ordered; the corresponding diagnosis was verified by a panel of two or
three radiologists. Four radiologists blindly read the hard-copy imag
es obtained with screen-film or computed radiography. Six months later
, the radiologists read the computed radiographs by using an 8-bit, 1,
684 x 2,048-pixel display. The data were analyzed by using multireader
-multicase receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of varianc
e. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in the area under
the ROC curve were found between any of the methods. CONCLUSION: The
results provide some justification for using bedside chest computed ra
diography and for reading soft-copy images from a high-quality display
.