ACCURACY OF BEDSIDE CHEST HARD-COPY SCREEN-FILM VERSUS HARD-COPY AND SOFT-COPY COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHS IN A MEDICAL INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT - RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS

Citation
Hl. Kundel et al., ACCURACY OF BEDSIDE CHEST HARD-COPY SCREEN-FILM VERSUS HARD-COPY AND SOFT-COPY COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHS IN A MEDICAL INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT - RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS, Radiology, 205(3), 1997, pp. 859-863
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
00338419
Volume
205
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
859 - 863
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-8419(1997)205:3<859:AOBCHS>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical diagnostic accuracy of hard-copy read ings of screen-film bedside chest radiographs and both hard-and soft-c opy readings of bedside chest computed radiographs obtained in a medic al intensive care unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two samples of 95 cases were assembled from chest images obtained in 541 patients with either screen-film radiography or computed radiography. The cases were strat ified according to the clinical problem for which the examination was ordered; the corresponding diagnosis was verified by a panel of two or three radiologists. Four radiologists blindly read the hard-copy imag es obtained with screen-film or computed radiography. Six months later , the radiologists read the computed radiographs by using an 8-bit, 1, 684 x 2,048-pixel display. The data were analyzed by using multireader -multicase receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of varianc e. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in the area under the ROC curve were found between any of the methods. CONCLUSION: The results provide some justification for using bedside chest computed ra diography and for reading soft-copy images from a high-quality display .