Ib. Mandell et al., EFFECTS OF DIET AND SLAUGHTER END-POINT ON CARCASS COMPOSITION AND BEEF QUALITY IN CHAROLAIS CROSS STEERS, Canadian journal of animal science, 77(3), 1997, pp. 403-414
One hundred and eight Charolais cross steers were used to compare fora
ge versus grain feeding as affected by slaughter endpoint on carcass c
omposition and palatability attributes of beef. Diets included a 97% a
lfalfa silage ration or 68% high moisture corn, 25% alfalfa silage rat
ion from start of test to finish or a ration of 97% alfalfa silage fro
m start of test to day 42 of the trial followed by the 68% high moistu
re corn ration until slaughter. Cattle were slaughtered at either 4, 7
, or 10 mm ultrasound backfat. Grain feeding increased (P = 0.01) aver
age daily gain and decreased (P = 0.01) days to finish, while carcass
weight and grade fat were similar (P > 0.10) between diets. Palatabili
ty attributes were generally unaffected by diet with the exception of
slightly less (P = 0.09) beef flavour and more (P = 0.01) off flavour
in forage-fed beef versus grain-fed beef. Higher (P = 0.01) concentrat
ions of linolenic acid and lower (P = 0.09) concentrations of oleic ac
id in forage-fed beef may be partially responsible for diet difference
s in flavour. As slaughter endpoint increased from 4 to 7 mm backfat,
average daily gain, days to finish, and carcass weight increased (P =
0.01). Palatability attributes assessing juiciness and flavour did not
differ (P > 0.10) between slaughter endpoints. Beef from cattle slaug
htered at 10 mm backfat was rated higher (P < 0.05) for softness, tend
erness, acid chewiness than beef from cattle slaughtered at 4 and 7 mm
finish. Slaughter endpoint effects on ''tenderness'' attributes may p
artially explain why less tender beef is entering the marketplace.