EFFECTS OF DIET AND SLAUGHTER END-POINT ON CARCASS COMPOSITION AND BEEF QUALITY IN CHAROLAIS CROSS STEERS

Citation
Ib. Mandell et al., EFFECTS OF DIET AND SLAUGHTER END-POINT ON CARCASS COMPOSITION AND BEEF QUALITY IN CHAROLAIS CROSS STEERS, Canadian journal of animal science, 77(3), 1997, pp. 403-414
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience
ISSN journal
00083984
Volume
77
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
403 - 414
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-3984(1997)77:3<403:EODASE>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
One hundred and eight Charolais cross steers were used to compare fora ge versus grain feeding as affected by slaughter endpoint on carcass c omposition and palatability attributes of beef. Diets included a 97% a lfalfa silage ration or 68% high moisture corn, 25% alfalfa silage rat ion from start of test to finish or a ration of 97% alfalfa silage fro m start of test to day 42 of the trial followed by the 68% high moistu re corn ration until slaughter. Cattle were slaughtered at either 4, 7 , or 10 mm ultrasound backfat. Grain feeding increased (P = 0.01) aver age daily gain and decreased (P = 0.01) days to finish, while carcass weight and grade fat were similar (P > 0.10) between diets. Palatabili ty attributes were generally unaffected by diet with the exception of slightly less (P = 0.09) beef flavour and more (P = 0.01) off flavour in forage-fed beef versus grain-fed beef. Higher (P = 0.01) concentrat ions of linolenic acid and lower (P = 0.09) concentrations of oleic ac id in forage-fed beef may be partially responsible for diet difference s in flavour. As slaughter endpoint increased from 4 to 7 mm backfat, average daily gain, days to finish, and carcass weight increased (P = 0.01). Palatability attributes assessing juiciness and flavour did not differ (P > 0.10) between slaughter endpoints. Beef from cattle slaug htered at 10 mm backfat was rated higher (P < 0.05) for softness, tend erness, acid chewiness than beef from cattle slaughtered at 4 and 7 mm finish. Slaughter endpoint effects on ''tenderness'' attributes may p artially explain why less tender beef is entering the marketplace.