M. Shannon et al., SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF FLUMAZENIL IN THE REVERSAL OF BENZODIAZEPINE-INDUCED CONSCIOUS SEDATION, The Journal of pediatrics, 131(4), 1997, pp. 582-586
Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of flumazenil when giv
en for reversal of benzodiazepine-induced conscious sedation in childr
en. Design: Multicenter study conducted in emergency departments and p
ediatric endoscopy, bronchoscopy, or oncology suites. Patients: One hu
ndred seven children (median age, 6 years; range, 1 to 17 years) who r
eceived intravenous benzodiazepine for an invasive procedure. Interven
tions: Flumazenil was given in increments of 0.01 mg/kg (0.2 mg maximu
m) at 1-minute intervals to a maximum total dose of 0.05 mg/kg (1.0 mg
maximum). Measurements: Clinical efficacy was assessed by the Clinica
l Global Impression Scale and Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedat
ion Scale. The OAA/S, vital signs, lead II electrocardiogram, and clin
ical assessments were recorded at 0, 10, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes a
fter flumazenil was given. Results: All children received midazolam (m
ean total dose, 0.18 mg/kg) for sedation. One hundred (96%) patients a
chieved a complete or partial response to flumazenil by 10 minutes aft
er its administration, on the basis of their CGIS scores (the mean dos
e of flumazenil administered at the time of the first complete respons
e was 0.017 +/- 0.010 mg/kg). Seventy-one of 93 (76%) patients with a
baseline OAA/S score less than or equal to 3 (1 = deep sleep, 5 = aler
t) experienced an increase of greater than or equal to 2 points at 10
minutes after flumazenil administration and 81 of 93 (87%) had a score
of 4 or 5 after flumazenil administration. Seven patients, all within
the 1- to 5-year age range, experienced resedation after initially re
sponding to flumazenil. Thirty-seven of 107 patients (35%) experienced
a total of 56 adverse events, most of which were considered to be unr
elated to flumazenil administration. The most frequently occurring adv
erse events were abnormal crying, dizziness, nausea, fever, and headac
he. There were no clinically significant changes in vital signs or ECG
tracings. No adverse events resulted in premature termination of drug
administration. Conclusions: Flumazenil promptly and effectively reve
rses the central nervous system depressant effects of midazolam in chi
ldren undergoing conscious sedation, with no significant adverse effec
ts. Because of the potential for resedation, children who receive flum
azenil should be monitored for 1 to 2 hours after its administration.