K. Nakagawa et al., AVOIDANCE OF OOCYTE RETRIEVAL ON THE WEEKEND THROUGH THE USE OF SCHEDULED OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION FOR IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION AND EMBRYO-TRANSFER, Fertility and sterility, 68(5), 1997, pp. 787-790
Objective: To avoid oocyte retrieval for IVF-ET during the weekend, th
e scheduled method of ovarian hyperstimulation, in which oocyte retrie
val is planned in advance for Monday through Wednesday, was evaluated.
Design: A retrospective study. Setting: The IVF-ET unit of the Depart
ment of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Tokushima University Hospital. Pa
tient(s): One hundred seventy-eight cycles in patients undergoing ovar
ian hyperstimulation for IVF-ET were stimulated according to the sched
uled method of ovarian hyperstimulation (scheduled group). One hundred
seventy-one cycles in patients of similar age and with comparable cau
ses of infertility were stimulated according to the conventional metho
d of ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF-ET (conventional group). Interve
ntion(s): In the scheduled method, under GnRH-a, the day of oocyte ret
rieval was determined in advance for IVF-ET. Ovarian stimulation with
FSH and hMG was started 12 days before oocyte retrieval. Main Outcome
Measure(s): The cancellation and clinical pregnancy rates (PRs), the d
ays of oocyte retrieval, and other clinical parameters were evaluated
in the two groups. Result(s): The cancellation rates in the scheduled
and conventional groups were 9.6% and 4.7%, respectively. In about 75%
of cycles in the scheduled group, oocyte retrieval was conducted on t
he scheduled day. When oocyte retrieval was scheduled for Monday throu
gh Wednesday, overtime work on the weekend could be avoided in 91% of
the cycles without cancellation. The clinical PR was comparable betwee
n the two groups. Conclusion(s): The scheduled method of ovarian hyper
stimulation for IVF-ET was useful for avoiding oocyte retrieval on the
weekend. (C) 1997 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.