Md. Hornstein et al., USE OF NAFARELIN VERSUS PLACEBO AFTER REDUCTIVE LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY FOR ENDOMETRIOSIS, Fertility and sterility, 68(5), 1997, pp. 860-864
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) nafar
elin compared with placebo administered for 6 months after reductive l
aparoscopic surgery for symptomatic endometriosis. Design: Randomized,
prospective, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial. Setting:
Thirteen clinics including private practice and university centers. P
atient(s): One hundred nine women aged 18-47 with laparoscopically pro
ven endometriosis and pelvic pain who had undergone reductive laparosc
opic surgery for endometriosis. Intervention(s): Patients were randomi
zed to receive either the GnRH-a nafarelin (200 mu g twice daily) or p
lacebo for 6 months. Main Outcome Measure(s): Time to initiation of al
ternative treatment (the length of time from beginning study medicatio
n to receiving alternative therapy or to deeming that the study drug w
as ineffective) and patient-reported and physician-assessed pelvic pai
n scores. Result(s): The median time to initiation of alternative trea
tment was >24 months in the nafarelin group versus 11.7 months in the
placebo group. Fifteen (31%) of 49 nafarelin-treated patients required
alternative therapy, compared with 25 (57%) of 44 placebo-treated pat
ients. The patients' pelvic pain scores dropped significantly in the n
afarelin and placebo groups after 6 months of treatment. Physician sum
mary ratings showed significant improvement in the nafarelin group and
no significant changes in the placebo group after 6 months of treatme
nt. Conclusion(s): Compared with placebo, nafarelin administered after
reductive laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis significantly delays
the return of endometriosis symptoms requiring further treatment. (C)
1997 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.