EFFECTIVENESS OF A REGIONAL TRAUMA SYSTEM IN REDUCING MORTALITY FROM MAJOR TRAUMA - BEFORE AND AFTER STUDY

Citation
J. Nicholl et J. Turner, EFFECTIVENESS OF A REGIONAL TRAUMA SYSTEM IN REDUCING MORTALITY FROM MAJOR TRAUMA - BEFORE AND AFTER STUDY, BMJ. British medical journal, 315(7119), 1997, pp. 1349-1354
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
09598138
Volume
315
Issue
7119
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1349 - 1354
Database
ISI
SICI code
0959-8138(1997)315:7119<1349:EOARTS>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effect of the development of an experimental trauma centre and regional trauma system on the survival of patients w ith major trauma. Design: Controlled before and after study examining outcomes between 1990 and 1993, spanning the introduction of the syste m in 1991-2. Setting: Trauma centre in North Staffordshire Royal Infir mary and five associated district general hospitals in the North West Midlands regional trauma system, and two control regions in Lancashire and Humberside. Subjects: All trauma patients taken by the ambulance services serving the regions or arriving other than by ambulance with injury severity scores > 15, whether or not they had vital signs on ar rival at hospital. Main outcome measures: Survival rates standardised for age, severity of injury, and revised trauma score. Results: In 199 0, 33% of major trauma patients in the experimental region were taken to the trauma centre, and by 1993 this had risen to only 39%, Crude de ath rates changed by the same amount in the control regions (46.5% in 1990-1 to 44.4% in 1992-3) as in the experimental region (44.8% to 41. 3%), After standardisation, the estimated change in the probability of dying in the experimental region compared with the control regions wa s -0.8% per year (95% confidence interval -3.6% to 2.2%); for out of h ours care, the change was 1.6% per year (-2.3% to 5.6%), and, for mult iply injured patients, the change was -1.6% (-6.1% to 2.6%). Conclusio n: Any reductions in mortality from regionalising major trauma care in shire areas of England would probably be modest compared with reports fr om the United States.