MEASURING HYGIENE PRACTICES - A COMPARISON OF QUESTIONNAIRES WITH DIRECT OBSERVATIONS IN RURAL ZAIRE

Citation
M. Manunebo et al., MEASURING HYGIENE PRACTICES - A COMPARISON OF QUESTIONNAIRES WITH DIRECT OBSERVATIONS IN RURAL ZAIRE, TM & IH. Tropical medicine & international health, 2(11), 1997, pp. 1015-1021
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
13602276
Volume
2
Issue
11
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1015 - 1021
Database
ISI
SICI code
1360-2276(1997)2:11<1015:MHP-AC>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
To date questionnaire surveys have been the most commonly used instrum ents to measure hygiene behaviours related to water and sanitation. Mo re recently, a number of studies have used structured observations to study practices related to diarrhoea. During a trial of a hygiene educ ation intervention to reduce diarrhoea among young children in Bandund u, Zaire, both instruments were used to measure the disposal of child faeces and various hand-washing practices. Three hundred families were observed and follow-up interviews performed with 274 (91%) mothers. A t the individual level, agreement between observed and reported behavi our was little better than might be expected by chance. There was evid ence of over-reporting of hand-washing before food preparation (44% vs 33%; P = 0.03), hand-washing before eating (76% vs 60%; P < 0.001) an d disposal of the child's faeces in a latrine (75% vs 40%; P < 0.001). On the other hand, hand-washing before feeding the child was reported less often than it was observed (7% vs 64%; P < 0.001). Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that, in general, mothers over-report ' desirable' behaviours. At the same time, our data indicate that open q uestions may lead to underreporting of certain behaviours. The repeata bility of observations at both the individual and population levels re mains to be established.