Objective To identify possible causes of inaccuracy in the use of the
Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer and methods that could reduce th
is. Methods Four Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometers were compared
with a standard sphygmomanometer under static conditions. Two methods
(standard and rapid) were used to release pressure from the inflated c
uff with pressures recorded by independent blinded observers. The rate
at which the hand valve released pressure was analysed. The effects o
f varying filling times and pressures on the size of the final zero co
rrection were investigated. Results The Hawksley devices all under-rec
orded pressure compared with that measured by using a standard machine
. A rapid means of pressure release approximately halved this error in
each case. Pressure release through the hand valve was shown to have
a characteristic and prolonged exponential decay. Using low filling ti
mes and pressures reduced the observed range of zeros seen, with the p
roduction of a correlation between the size of the zero and the inflat
ion pressure used. Conclusion These findings suggest that overestimati
on of the final zero correction is a common and major source of error
in the use of the Hawksley sphygmomanometer. A simple change in the de
sign of the final pressure release would improve the machine's reliabi
lity in clinical usage. The machine's zero mechanism is susceptible to
unintentional misuse. Such misuse could occur when the machine is use
d in accordance with current sphygmomanometry guidelines.