Pe. Savage et al., THERMAL CLEAVAGE OF THE ONE-ATOM ARYL-HYDROARYL BRIDGE IN 8-(1-NAPHTHYLMETHYL)-3,4-DIHYDRONAPHTHALENE, Energy & fuels, 11(6), 1997, pp. 1264-1271
2-(1-Naphthylmethyl)-3,4-dihydronaphthal (NMDN) was pyrolyzed neat at
temperatures between 300 and 385 degrees C for batch holding times bet
ween 20 and 360 min. The products formed in the highest molar yields a
t moderate conversions are 2-(1-naphthalenylmethyl)naphthalene (dinaph
thylnethane), 1-methylnaphthalene, 1,2-dihydronaphthalene (dialin), an
d 2-(1-naphthylmethyl)tetrahydronaphthalene (naphthyltetralylmethane).
At higher conversions, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene (tetralin) and n
aphthalene appeared as important products. The temporal variations of
the products' molar yields indicated that all of the products above, s
ave tetralin, were primary products. These assignments led to a NMDN r
eaction network that comprises four parallel, stoichiometricelly balan
ced, primary pathways. These paths lead to dinaphthyl-methane plus H-2
, to dialin plus 1-methylnaphthalene plus dinaphthylmethane, to naphth
yltetralylmethane plus dinaphthylmethane, and to naphthalene plus 2-me
thyldialin plus dinaphthylmethane. The kinetics of NMDN disappearance
at 325 degrees C were consistent with a second-order rate law: The Arr
henius parameters for the second-order rate constant, determined at te
mperatures between 300 and 385 degrees C; are log A (L/(mol s)) = 8.8
+/- 1.1 and E = 36.4 +/- 3.2 kcal/mol. The observed reaction products
and kinetics are consistent with a free-radical mechanism. Molecular d
isproportionation generates reactive free-radical intermediates, which
can then participate in chain reactions to form the observed products
. The observed kinetics are consistent with two different assumptions
about the rates of different elementary steps in the mechanism; One is
that the molecular disproportionation step is rate controlling and th
e other is that the chain reactions possess a long kinetic chain lengt
h. An examination of the kinetics of NMDN disappearance, alone, is not
sufficient to discriminate between these two mutually exclusive possi
bilities.