THE UPSHERSCOPE(TM) IN ROUTINE AND DIFFICULT AIRWAY MANAGEMENT - A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL

Citation
P. Fridrich et al., THE UPSHERSCOPE(TM) IN ROUTINE AND DIFFICULT AIRWAY MANAGEMENT - A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL, Anesthesia and analgesia, 85(6), 1997, pp. 1377-1381
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00032999
Volume
85
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1377 - 1381
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-2999(1997)85:6<1377:TUIRAD>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
The UpsherScope(TM), a rigid fiberoptic laryngoscope, may facilitate t racheal intubation. We performed a randomized, controlled trial of tra cheal intubation using the UpsherScope(TM) and compared the success ra te with that of direct laryngoscopy. Three hundred patients were rando mly assigned to either fiberoptic oral intubation using the UpsherScop e(TM) (Group US, n = 148) or to direct laryngoscopy (Group DL, n = 152 ). No significant differences in airway variables were observed betwee n the groups. US intubation was successful in 129 of 148 patients (87% ). A second or third attempt was required in 15% and 3%, respectively, of the patients successfully intubated with US. The remaining patient s were intubated using DL (n = 17) or the flexible fiberoptic bronchos cope (n = 2). The success rate of DL was significantly higher (97%; P < 0.05), with a second or third attempt required in only seven patient s. Time needed to perform successful intubation was 50 +/- 41s for the US group compared with 23 +/- 13 s for the DL group (P < 0.05). We fo und no advantage of the UpsherScope(TM) over direct laryngoscopy durin g routine and difficult airway management. Time needed, number of atte mpts required to perform intubation, and incidence of failure were sig nificantly longer and higher in group US. Implications: We studied tra cheal intubation using the fiberoptic UpsherScope(TM) and compared the success rate with that of a control group of patients intubated using conventional laryngoscopy. No advantages of the new device were found . On the contrary, time needed, number of attempts required, and incid ence of failure were even longer and higher.