RAPID PROTOTYPING (STEREOLITHOGRAPHY) IN THE MANAGEMENT OF INTRAARTICULAR CALCANEAL FRACTURES

Citation
Gm. Kacl et al., RAPID PROTOTYPING (STEREOLITHOGRAPHY) IN THE MANAGEMENT OF INTRAARTICULAR CALCANEAL FRACTURES, European radiology, 7(2), 1997, pp. 187-191
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
09387994
Volume
7
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
187 - 191
Database
ISI
SICI code
0938-7994(1997)7:2<187:RP(ITM>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic p erformance of stereolithography vs workstation-based three-dimensional (3D) reformations in intra-articular calcaneal fractures. A total of 30 intra-articular calcaneal fractures were examined using standard ra diographs, coronal CT scans, and 2D and 3D reformations. The CT data w ere transferred to an outside institution, and stereolithograms were p roduced from photopolymer resin employing a laser beam system. 3D refo rmations and stereolithograms were analyzed in a blinded fashion by tw o staff radiologists. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves w ere obtained for six clinically significant fracture components. Stand ard radiographs, coronal CT scans, and 2D reformations served as the s tandard of reference. The area under the ROC curves for 3D reformation s and stereolithograms were 1.0 and 0.98 for abnormal tuber angles, 0. 91 and 0.91 for anterior and middle talo-calcaneal joint involvement, 0.90 and 0.95 for involvement of the posterior talo-calcaneal joint, 0 .65 and 0.78 for the presence of a lateral bulge, 0.80 and 0.81 for th e involvement of the calcaneocuboidal joint, and 0.62 and 0.67 for the presence of a ''tongue-type'' fracture. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated for the two methods (Wilcoxon signed-rank test,p = 0.138). Based on our results stereolithograms did not prove t o be statistically superior to workstation-based 3D reformations. Ster eolithograms may still be useful for teaching purposes and for surgica l planning at a thinking-efficacy level.