This Article challenges the accusation that juries are ill-equipped to
do justice in a complex society. The consequences of debunking the co
mmonly believed notion of jury incompetence are twofold. First, it rev
eals an alternative explanation of contemporary distrust of jurors--th
at distrust of juries is symptomatic of a larger dynamic whereby citiz
ens distrust any institution of democratic decision-making when the de
cision-makers are diverse from themselves. Second, that much of the cu
rrent slate of proposed jury reforms, which are based on the false pre
mise of juror incompetence, will harm the institution of trial-by-jury
to no end.