Jp. Lerut et al., ADULT LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION AND ABNORMALITIES OF SPLANCHNIC VEINS - EXPERIENCE IN 53 PATIENTS, Transplant international, 10(2), 1997, pp. 125-132
The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of technical proble
ms resulting from splanchnic venous anomalies on the outcome of orthot
opic liver transplantation. From February 1984 until December 1995, 53
(16.3 %) of 326 adults underwent consecutive transplantations whilst
having acquired anomalies of the splanchnic veins. These consisted of
portal vein thrombosis (n = 32, 9.8 %), thrombosis with inflammatory v
enous changes (phlebitis; n = 6, 1.8 %) and alterations related to por
tal hypertension surgery (n = 15, 4.6 %). Because of major changes in
surgical technique, i, e., eversion instead of blind venous thrombecto
my, immediate superior mesenteric vein approach in cases of extended t
hrombosis, and piggyback implantation with preservation instead of rem
oval of the inferior vena cava, patients were divided into two groups:
those who underwent transplantation during the period February 1984 t
o December 1990 (group 1) and those transplanted between January 1991
and December 1995 (group 2), Surgical procedures to overcome the anoma
lies consisted of venous thrombectomy (n = 26), implantation of the do
nor portal vein at the splenomesenteric confluence (n = 5) or onto a s
plenic (n = 1) or ileal varix (n = 1), interposition of a free iliac v
enous graft between recipient superior mesenteric vein and donor porta
l vein (n = 9,) and interruption of surgical portosystemic shunt (n =
13). All patients had a complete follow-up. The 1- and 5-year actuaria
l patient survival rates were similar in patients with (n = 53) and wi
thout (n = 273) splanchnic venous abnormalities (75.5 % vs 78,1 % and
64.3 % vs 66.9 %, respectively), Early (< 3 months) post-transplant mo
rtality was 24.5 % (13/53 patients). Mortality was highest in the port
al vein thrombophlebitis group (5/6, 83.3 %), followed by the portal h
ypertension surgery group (5/15, 33.3 %) and the portal vein thrombosi
s group (3/32, 9.4 %). Technical modifications significantly reduced m
ortality in group 2 (10.3 %. 3/29 vs 41.7 %. 10/24 patients in group 1
; P < 0.05) as well as the need for re-exploration for bleeding (13.8
%. 4/29 patients in group 2 vs 15/24, 62.5 % in group 1; P < 0.01). Mo
rtality directly related to bleeding was also significantly lowered (1
/29, 3.4 % in group 2 vs 9/ 24, 37.5 % in group 1, P < 0.01). We concl
ude that liver transplantation can be safely performed in the presence
of splanchnic vein thrombosis and previous portal hypertension surger
y.