CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT BY IRRADIATION OF EPIDERMOID CANCERS OF THE ANAL-CANAL - PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF TUMORAL CONTROL AND COMPLICATIONS

Citation
D. Peiffert et al., CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT BY IRRADIATION OF EPIDERMOID CANCERS OF THE ANAL-CANAL - PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF TUMORAL CONTROL AND COMPLICATIONS, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 37(2), 1997, pp. 313-324
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
03603016
Volume
37
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
313 - 324
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-3016(1997)37:2<313:CTBIOE>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
We analyzed in a retrospective series of patients treated by conservat ive irradiation for an epidermoid cancer of the anal canal (ECAC) the prognostic factors of locoregional control (LRC), survival, late sever e complications (LSC), and sphincter conservation (SC). Methods and Ma terials: From 1976 until 1994, 118 patients presenting with an ECAC we re conservatively treated (mean age, 65 years). According to the 1987 International Union Against Cancer (TNM) classification, they were: 19 T1, 70 T2, 22 T3, 7 T4, 94 NO, and 24 N1-3. The treatment started wit h external beam irradiation (EBI) (36 Gy in 3 weeks or 45 Gy in 5 week s). Concomitant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C) was deli vered to 31 patients. Two months later, a boost of 20 Gy was delivered by interstitial Ir-192 brachytherapy to 101 patients and EBI in 5. Tw elve other patients had an abdominoperineal resection (APR). The mean follow-up was 6 years. Results: At 5 years the overall survival was 60 %, and specific survival (SS) was 75%; it was 94% for T1, 79% for T2, 53% for T3, and 19% for T4. In multivariate analysis, tumor size (grea ter than or equal to 4 cm), node involvement, and no response to the E BI were factors of poor prognosis for SS. Thirty-two locoregional recu rrences occurred of which 21 were local recurrences in the 106 patient s treated by a conservative schedule. Only tumor size and response to the EBI were prognostic factors on multivariate analysis for local and LRC. A total of 17 patients presented with LSC (Grade 3, 16 patients; and Grade 4, 1 patient), which was treated by APR in 4 patients and c olostomy in 11 (of which 7 were definitive). The only significant prog nostic factor for LSC in the multivariate analysis was the total extra polated response dose of irradiation. The definitive rate of SC after conservative treatment in cured patients was 100% for T1, 82% for T2, 58% for T3, and 100% for T4. Since 1989, improvements of the technique have allowed reduction of the LSC in maintaining the same local contr ol. Conclusion: The results of this series are similar to those of the literature. The confirmation of pretherapeutic prognostic factors rel ated to response to the treatment should allow us to adapt the therape utic intensity for each case to obtain better tumor control, with as f ew sequelae as possible, to yield a better rate of SC. (C) 1997 Elsevi er Science Inc.