ADVANCED CARDIAC LIFE-SUPPORT CONTROVERSY - WHERE DO ANTIARRHYTHMIC AGENTS FIT IN

Authors
Citation
Mss. Chow, ADVANCED CARDIAC LIFE-SUPPORT CONTROVERSY - WHERE DO ANTIARRHYTHMIC AGENTS FIT IN, Pharmacotherapy, 17(2), 1997, pp. 84-88
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Journal title
ISSN journal
02770008
Volume
17
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Part
2
Pages
84 - 88
Database
ISI
SICI code
0277-0008(1997)17:2<84:ACLC-W>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Approximately half of all. cardiovascular fatalities are attributable to sudden cardiac death, and the majority of sudden cardiac deaths res ult from ventricular fibrillation (VF). Antiarrhythmic agents are need ed to manage refractory VF and ventricular tachycardia (VT); the prima ry reason for their administration is to prevent recurrence of VF and to abolish VT. The American Heart Association recommends lidocaine hyd rochloride as a first-line antiarrhythmic agent in the advanced cardia c life support (ACLS) setting, followed by bretylium tosylate. Althoug h the newly approved intravenous antiarrhythmic agent, amiodarone hydr ochloride, may potentially be effective in ACLS, studies are needed to document its clinical benefit in this setting. Such studies are curre ntly under way to document this potential use.