Gk. Zagars et al., PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CARCINOMA - ANALYSIS OF 938 PATIENTS IRRADIATED IN THE PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN ERA, Cancer, 79(7), 1997, pp. 1370-1380
BACKGROUND. Pretreatment serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level i
s a powerful prognostic factor for clinically localized prostate carci
noma. The traditional prognostic factors, T classification and Gleason
score, appear to have been relegated to a minor position. This study
was conducted to evaluate the relative prognostic roles of PSA, T clas
sification, and Gleason score in a large cohort of men irradiated in t
he PSA era. METHODS. The authors analyzed the outcome for a group of 9
38 men with T1-T4, NO or NX, MO prostate carcinoma who received defini
tive external beam radiation therapy as their only initial treatment d
uring tile period 1987-1995. The T classifications were as follows: T1
, 283 (30%); T2, 360 (38%); T3/T4, 295 (31%). Gleason scores were as f
ollows: Gleason 2-6, 580 (62%); Gleason 7, 224 (24%); Gleason 8-10, 12
2 (13%). Pretreatment PSA levels (ng/mL) were as follows: PSA less tha
n or equal to 4, 167 (18%); PSA 4 to less than or equal to 10, 363 (39
%); PSA 10 to less than or equal to 20, 259 (28%); PSA > 20, 149 (16%)
. At a mean follow-up of 43 months (range, 6-106 months), disease outc
ome specified as relapse/rising PSA, local recurrence, or metastasis w
as analyzed using univariate and multivariate techniques. RESULTS. The
6-year actuarial incidences of relapse/rising PSA, local recurrence,
and metastases were 48%, 27%, and, 6%, respectively, In multivariate r
egression, pretreatment PSA level, T classification, and Gleason score
were each independently highly significantly (P < 0.001) correlated w
ith every endpoint. Pretreatment PSA level was the most significant va
riable for rising PSA and local recurrence, and T classification was t
he most significant variable for metastatic relapse. Using relapse/ris
ing PSA as the endpoint, the authors formulated a highly significant 6
-tier prognostic grouping based on PSA, T classification, and Gleason
score, as follows: Category I: T1/T2, PSA less than or equal to 4, and
Gleason 2-6 (relapse rate, 6%); Category II: T1/T2, PSA less than or
equal to 4 and Gleason 7-10, or PSA 4 to less than or equal to 10 and
Gleason 2-7 (relapse rate, 30%); Category III: T1/T2, PSA 4 to less th
an or equal to 10 and Gleason 8-10, or PSA 10 to less than or equal to
20 and Gleason < 8 (relapse rate, 40%); Category IV: T3/T4, PSA < 10
(relapse rate, 46%); Category V: T3/T4, PSA 10 to less than or equal t
o 20, and Gleason < 8 (relapse rate, 57%); Category unfavorable: any T
, PSA > 20 and any Gleason, or PSA 10 to less than or equal to 20 and
Gleason 8-10 (relapse rate, 88%). CONCLUSIONS. The establishment of T
classification and Gleason score as independent prognostic factors bri
dges an apparent gap between an older era and tile current PSA era. PS
A has supplemented, rather than supplanted, the utility of the traditi
onally established prognostic factors for clinically localized prostat
e carcinoma. (C) 1997 American Cancer Society.