Lm. Epstein et al., SLOW AV NODAL PATHWAY ABLATION UTILIZING A UNIQUE TEMPERATURE-CONTROLLED RADIOFREQUENCY ENERGY SYSTEM, PACE, 20(3), 1997, pp. 664-670
Thiry-nine consecutive patients with symptomatic AV nodal reentrant ta
chycardia (AVNRT) underwent temperature guided slow AV nodal pathway a
blation (group 1). Forty-three consecutive patients undergoing nontemp
erature guided slow AV nodal pathway ablation late in our experience c
ompose she control population (group 2). Slow pathway ablation was ach
ieved in all patients of both groups. The mean fluoroscopy and ablatio
n times for group 1 were significantly shorter than for group 2 (26.1
+/- 14.9 vs 33.9 +/- 18.9 min, P < 0.05; 19.9 +/- 12.1 vs 30.9 +/- 23.
3 min, P less than or equal to 0.02). There were no episodes of coagul
um formation in group 1, while there were 15 episodes (7.1% of energy
applications) in group 2 (P = 0.0006) despite a significantly higher a
pplied power in group 1 (53.4 +/- 25.1 vs 35.6 +/- 9.5W, P = 0.0001).
Successful energy applications were associated with significantly high
er temperatures than unsuccessful applications in group 1 (55.6 degree
s +/- 5.8 degrees C vs. 52.9 degrees +/- 6.8 degrees C, P less than or
equal to 0.03). The minimum temperature required for successful ablat
ion was 48 degrees C for two patients (5%) and was greater than or equ
al to 50 degrees C for the remainder of patients (37/39[95%]). The cat
heter ablation system used in this study was safe, effective, and prev
ented coagulum formation while delivering relatively high power. In ad
dition, shorter ablation times and radiation exposure were seen with t
his system. Although successful energy applications and the production
of junctional rhythm were associated with higher achieved temperature
s, temperature alone did not predict either endpoint. Future prospecti
ve, randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings and further
evaluate the value of temperature monitoring.