J. Reinsberg et D. Krebs, ARE HUMAN ANTIIDIOTYPIC ANTI-OC125 ANTIBODIES FORMED AFTER IMMUNIZATION WITH THE ANTI-CA125 ANTIBODY B43.13, Hybridoma, 16(1), 1997, pp. 59-63
The two monoclonal antibodies (MAb) OC125 and B43.13 both recognize an
tigenic determinants on the cancer antigen 125 (CA125) molecule, The a
im of the present study was to clarify how far antibodies formed by pa
tients treated with B43.13 may cross-react with idiotopes of OC125. Se
rum samples from 15 ovarian cancer patients treated with B43.13 were t
ested for the presence of anti-idiotypic anti-OC125 antibodies; 4 of t
hese patients previously had received OC125 F(ab')(2) fragments. Six p
atients treated only with B43.13 and all patients pretreated with OC12
5 fragments developed a considerable increase of human anti-mouse anti
bodies after B43.13 infusion, indicating an immune response to antibod
y infusion, However, none of the patients treated only with B43-13 dev
eloped detectable levels of anti-idiotypic anti-OC125 antibodies, wher
eas in 2 patients pretreated with OC125 fragments, the pre-existing co
ncentration of anti-idiotypic anti-OC125 antibodies further increased
after B43.13 infusion. The binding of these newly formed antibodies to
OC125 was not inhibited by the B43.13, but about 70% of the binding w
as inhibited by the CA125 antigen, The present data suggest that the i
diotopes expressed on the antibodies B43.13 and OC125, respectively, a
re completely different, Thus, anti-idiotypic anti-B43.13 antibodies m
ay not cross-react with OC125, A greater number of cases is needed to
clarify how far the increase of anti-idiotypic anti-OC125 antibodies o
bserved in 2 patients pretreated with OC125 fragments really is due to
B43.13 infusion.